Skip to main content
Download PDF

The ultimate preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio is a prognostic factor for survival after pancreatic cancer resection

European Journal of Medical Research volume 25, Article number: 46 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Emerging evidence indicates that an elevated C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) may be associated with a poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Further evidence showing that this ratio has significant prognostic value could contribute to current prediction models and clinical decision-making.

Methods

Data were analysed of consecutive patients who underwent curative pancreatic resection between 2013 and 2018 and were histologically diagnosed with PDAC. We investigated the relation between the ultimate preoperative CAR and overall survival.

Results

A total of 163 patients were analysed. Median overall survival was 18 months (IQR 9–36). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a higher CAR (HR 1.745, P = 0.004), a higher age (HR 1.062, P < 0.001), male sex (HR 1.977, P = 0.001), poor differentiation grade (HR 2.812, P < 0.001), and positive para-aortic lymph node(s) (HR 4.489, P < 0.001) were associated with a lower overall survival. Furthermore, a CAR ≥ 0.2 was associated with decreased overall survival (16 vs. 26 months, P = 0.003).

Conclusion

We demonstrated that an ultimate preoperative elevated CAR is an independent indicator of decreased overall survival after resection for PDAC. The preoperative CAR may be of additional value to the current prediction models.

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate of 9% for all stages combined [1]. For pancreatic tumours, surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment while (neo-)adjuvant therapy is gaining ground. Since morbidity and mortality rates after surgery are high, there is a need for identifying preoperative biomarkers that would enable better stratification of patients who may benefit from surgery.

In recent years, emerging evidence has shown the potential value of a variety of systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores in pancreatic cancer [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Serum elevation of C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute-phase protein, has been shown to be a prognostic indicator in a variety of neoplasms [8,9,10,11]. Moreover, hypoalbuminemia brought about by malnutrition and related to cachexia has been reported to be correlated with an unfavourable prognosis of gastrointestinal tumours [12, 13].

An elevated C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) or a composite score such as the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) seems to be potentially useful biomarkers for survival, but the evidence remains controversial [2, 3, 6, 14]. The mGPS combines the serum elevation of CRP and the decrease in albumin concentration, whereas the CAR is a continuous and more quantitative measure. Two recent meta-analyses showed that CAR was a useful prognostic factor of outcome in patients with pancreatic cancer; however, both studies included only studies in Asian populations [15, 16]. Furthermore, there is no consensus about the optimal cut-off value of CAR. The cut-off value of CAR ranged between 0.04 and 3.85 within the included studies in the meta-analysis from Zang et al. [16]. Currently, the most reliable prognostic factors for survival after PDAC are tumour size, lymph node status, resection margin and differentiation grade [17]. However, these prognostic factors rely on surgical exploration [5]. Further evidence demonstrating that the CAR can predict survival may contribute to current prediction models and support clinical (shared) decision-making. The aim of our study was to investigate the prognostic value of the ultimate preoperative CAR and the optimal cut-off value after resection for PDAC as compared with several established prognostic factors.

Methods

Patients

Between January 2013 and December 2018, all consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic resection and were pathologically diagnosed with PDAC at the University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands, or the Isala clinics, the Netherlands, were included in the present study. All medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if data relating to their preoperative CRP or albumin were missing or if they already had metastatic disease at the time of resection. All patients were followed up until October 2019 or death. Survival status was assured using the national Personal Records Database. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University Medical Centre Groningen and Isala Zwolle (research registration number: 201900699).

Data collection

Baseline characteristics were collected from the electronic medical record system. Laboratory tests were routinely conducted for each patient preoperatively. The laboratory results closest to the date of surgery were used for analysis. The following laboratory tests were conducted: CA 19-9, CEA, haemoglobin, bilirubin, CRP and albumin. The CAR was calculated by dividing the serum-CRP level by the serum-albumin level [2, 3]. The mGPS was calculated according to the following method: patients with an albumin level greater than 35 g/L and a CRP level less than < 10 mg/L were scored 0; patients with only an elevated CRP (> 1 mg/dL) were scored 1; and patients with low albumin (< 3.5 g/dL) and high CRP (> 1 mg/dL) were scored 2 [18]. Patients’ preoperative physical performance was determined according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) [19] scale and the ASA-score. The type of pancreatic resection was selected based on tumour location and was classified into two groups: pancreatic head resections (pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy, or Whipple procedure) and other types of pancreatic resection (distal pancreatectomy, central pancreatectomy, total pancreatectomy). Postoperative complications were categorised into minor (Clavien–Dindo 1–2) and major complications (Clavien–Dindo 3–5). Overall survival time was defined as the time between date of surgery and date of the final follow-up or date of death.

Statistical analysis

Discrete variables were described as total and percentage, and continuous variables as median and interquartile range (IQR). The primary outcome was overall survival after pancreatic resection with curative intention. Univariate Cox regression was used to identify possible prognostic factors (i.e., when the P value was below 0.1). These variables, along with known prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer, were included in a stepwise multivariate Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis to ascertain independent prognostic factors. For the CAR, the optimal cut-off point was estimated with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using Youden’s index. The resulting bivariate variable (high or low ratio) was also tested for prognostic value in overall survival. Additionally, baseline and clinicopathological characteristics were tested on difference in patients with low and high CAR (Chi-square test, Fischer’s exact test, Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate). P values under the significance level of 0.05 were considered significant. For all statistical analyses, SPSS version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY) was used.

Results

Study population

A total of 207 patients underwent resection of histologically confirmed PDAC at our institutes from 2013 to 2018. In 40 patients, CRP or albumin were not determined preoperatively. Additionally, four patients were retrospectively found to have metastatic disease at the time of resection (two pulmonary, one hepatic, and one omental metastasis). This left 163 individuals resected with curative intent for our study population (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of patient inclusion PDAC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, CRP C-reactive protein

Full size image

Baseline and clinicopathological characteristics

Baseline and clinicopathological characteristics are presented in Table 1. Postoperative major morbidity occurred in 26 patients (16%), and the mortality rates within 30 and 90 days were one (0.6%) and nine (5.5%), respectively. Differences in baseline and clinicopathological characteristics between patients with low (< 0.2) and high CAR (≥ 0.2) are also presented in Table 1. Mean haemoglobin was lower in patients with high CAR (P < 0.001), and patients with high CAR had a higher metastatic lymph node ratio. Although the type of resection appeared to be different between patients with high and low CAR, when grouping the resections into pancreatoduodenectomy (pancreas-head tumours) and other pancreatic resections, no significant difference was observed (P = 0.112).

Table 1 Baseline and clinicopathological characteristics in relation to CAR with cut-off at 0.2. Percentages represent proportion within group
Full size table

Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox multiple regression for overall survival

Median overall survival was 18 months (IQR 9–36) in the study population. Univariate Cox proportional-hazard regression was used to identify variables that were possibly associated with overall survival (Table 2). Stepwise multivariate Cox regression was performed using the variables sex, age, ECOG performance grade, haemoglobin, CAR, neo-adjuvant therapy, type of resection, tumour size, tumour differentiation grade, metastatic lymph node ratio, para-aortic lymph node status, and radicality. The ultimate proportional-hazard model was significant (P < 0.001) and consisted of sex, age, CAR, differentiation grade, and para-aortic lymph node status. A higher CAR was independently associated with lower survival; the hazard ratio was 1.745 (95% CI 1.200–2.539, P = 0.004). Due to significant collinearity with CRP and albumin, haemoglobin level was analysed separately, and stepwise Cox regression demonstrated that haemoglobin was not significantly associated with survival. Furthermore, when analysing CRP and albumin separately in multivariate analysis, only CRP was independently associated with survival (HR 1.006, 95% CI 1.006–1.027, P = 0.002). Additionally, when replacing the CAR by the mGPS, the variable mGPS ended in the ultimate regression model, but was non-significant (P = 0.077).

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox multiple regression for overall survival. Variables presented under multivariate analysis represent the final model after stepwise exclusion
Full size table

Determination of the cut-off point for the CAR

The mean CAR was 0.38 (SD 0.54); the median CAR was 0.16 (IQR 0.07–0.42). The optimal cut-off for the CAR ratio in predicting overall mortality was estimated using a ROC curve. Maximum sensitivity and specificity were found at a ratio of 0.2, which corresponded with a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity 69%, a positive predictive value of 78%, and a negative predictive value of 42% (Table 3).

Table 3 Number of patients who did survive and did not survive in relation to high and low C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) with a cut-off value of 0.2
Full size table

Overall survival

Median overall survival in patients with a low CAR was 26 months (IQR 11–56), and in patients with a high CAR 16 months (IQR 7–24). The final model using a bivariate variable of low (< 0.2) and high (≥ 0.2) CAR revealed that this variable was an independent prognostic factor as well (P < 0.001, HR 2.129, 95% CI 1.395–3.251). Survival was lower in patients with a high CAR (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Overall survival of patients with low (< 0.2) and high (≥ 0.2) C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratios, corrected for age, sex, differentiation grade, and positive para-aortic lymph nodes using Cox regression

Full size image

Discussion

Our results demonstrated that a higher CAR together with a higher age, male sex, poor differentiation grade and positive para-aortic lymph node(s) was associated with a lower overall survival. A CAR above 0.2 is associated with a decreased overall survival in patients with PDAC after curative pancreatic resection. Corresponding with the previous literature, in our study, the CAR was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients resected for PDAC [15, 16]. In addition, previous studies have shown the prognostic value of the mGPS on overall survival of patients with PDAC [20,21,22]. In our cohort, however, the mGPS was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, which was consistent with some previous studies [6, 14] although a prognostic trend was present. This might indicate that the CAR, being a continuous variable, may be a superior predictor if it is not condensed into a score or cut-off level. Therefore, we used the CAR as a continuous variable in the multivariate analysis. Doing so, we were more able to show a correlation between CAR and survival: the higher the ratio, the worse the predicted survival. In our cohort, maximum sensitivity (54%) and specificity (69%) were found at a CAR of 0.2. However, this result should be interpreted with caution since cut-off levels are rather heterogeneous in the literature. In a recent meta-analysis aiming to determine the potential role of CAR as a prognostic indicator in pancreatic cancer, the cut-off value of CAR ranged between 0.04 and 3.85 within the included studies [16]. Furthermore, both high CRP and low albumin were associated with poor survival, but only CRP was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, indicating that the prognostic value of CAR is mainly driven by CRP. There is increasing understanding of the mechanism of the relation between the CAR and survival in patients with cancer. C-reactive protein is a marker of inflammation, and an elevated serum level might be caused by tumour necrosis or local tissue damage [9]. In addition, an elevated CRP could be a marker for a beneficial environment for the origin and growth of metastases. An elevated CRP gives an upregulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor, which promotes the growth and proliferation of tumours [7]. In addition, CRP is produced in response to elevated interleukin-6 levels [8]. Interleukin-6 promotes tumour growth by inducing multiple signalling pathways, including proliferation, angiogenesis and metabolism [23]. Hypoalbuminemia is often thought to reflect malnutrition in patients. However, emerging evidence shows that a low albumin level may also be a reflection of an inflammatory state [24]. The exact cause of low albumin levels in patients with cancer is unclear. The literature suggests that it is a combination of several mechanisms. One explanation is that high interleukin-6 levels produced by cancer cells inhibit the synthesis of albumin [25]. Alternatively, it may be the result of an increase in vascular permeability, which causes a redistribution of albumin, leading to lower serum levels and high extra vascular fluid levels [26, 27]. In accordance with the literature, men had a lower overall survival than women did [28,29,30]. It is well known that pancreatic cancer occurs more frequently in men. The underlying cause remains unclear. Possible explanations include differences in environmental or occupational risk factors, but other lifestyle factors, such as heavy smoking and high alcohol intake in men, may also contribute [31]. Alternatively, undiscovered genetic factors may play a role. These possible factors were assumed to also contribute to a higher mortality risk. In a recent review of clinical prediction models for survival after pancreatic cancer surgery, it was found that tumour size, lymph node status, resection margin and differentiation grade were most often included in the final prediction models [17]. In this study, all these variables were analysed, and the multivariate analysis showed that, of these variables, only differentiation grade and para-aortic lymph node status were significantly associated with overall survival. In the same review, it was also suggested to include neo-adjuvant therapy in the analyses. In our study, neo-adjuvant therapy had no significant predictive value, probably due to the small number (n = 6) of patients receiving neo-adjuvant therapy. However, the role of neo-adjuvant therapy is currently being investigated in the PREOPANC II trial and the CAR in these patients could be the subject of research in the near future. Moreover, Strijker and others have recommended to include the location of the tumour in the pancreas as a variable since previous studies have demonstrated differences in tumour biology between tumours in the head and corpus/tail [32, 33]. In our study, no statistical difference in overall survival was observed between head and distal pancreatic resections. The authors of the review have also commented that to objectively predict the outcome for pancreatic tumours, a distinction between different types of pancreatic and periampullary tumours should be made. Our study had several important strengths: we included only PDACs; we made a distinction between tumour locations; and we confirmed patients’ survival status using the national Personal Records Database. Our study was limited, however, by its retrospective nature, which among other consequences, resulted in the limited availability of laboratory results and confounding factors like preoperative pancreatitis, cholangitis or biliary drainage. Since biliary drainage might influence CRP, it may have been appropriate to include this variable. We did, however, include in the analyses the bilirubin level, which had no significant association with overall survival and did not influence the outcome. Over the last decades, variables used to assess the immune system and inflammation have gained interest as prognostic biomarkers for the prediction of outcomes for pancreatic cancer [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Since immunotherapy may play an important role in the future treatment of pancreatic cancer, our study and future research concerning pre-treatment prognostic (systemic inflammatory) variables could be of significant value [34]. Other possible reliable pre-treatment prognostic factors of outcomes for pancreatic cancer, besides CAR, are sex [28,29,30], CA 19-9 [17], LDH [35], age [17], tumour location [32], tumour size [36] and imaging texture features of the pancreatic tumour [37, 38]. Future research should focus on the development of a prediction model which includes pre-treatment prognostic factors. A prediction model based on pre-treatment parameters is essential for optimal patient management, based on informed shared decision-making processes, clinical trial design and interpretation of results. In conclusion, this study showed that an elevated ultimate CAR was independently and significantly associated with decreased overall survival in patients with PDAC after pancreatic resection. The CAR may, therefore, be of additional value to current prediction models and may be helpful in clinical decision-making.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu M, Guo J, Guo L, Zuo Q. The C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts overall survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(9):12525–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haruki K, Shiba H, Shirai Y, Horiuchi T, Iwase R, Fujiwara Y, et al. The C-reactive protein to albumin ratio predicts long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer after pancreatic resection. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2254–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shirai Y, Shiba H, Sakamoto T, Horiuchi T, Haruki K, Fujiwara Y, et al. Preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio predicts outcome of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after pancreatic resection. Surgery. 2015;158(2):360–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aziz MH, Sideras K, Aziz NA, Mauff K, Haen R, Roos D, et al. The Systemic-immune-inflammation Index Independently Predicts Survival and Recurrence in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer and its Prognostic Value Depends on Bilirubin Levels: a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2019;270(1):139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang DS, Luo HY, Qiu MZ, Wang ZQ, Zhang DS, Wang FH, et al. Comparison of the prognostic values of various inflammation based factors in patients with pancreatic cancer. Med Oncol. 2012;29(5):3092–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen J, Gu Z, Wu M, Yang Y, Zhang J, Ou J, et al. C-reactive protein can upregulate VEGF expression to promote ADSC-induced angiogenesis by activating HIF-1alpha via CD64/PI3k/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomsen M, Kersten C, Sorbye H, Skovlund E, Glimelius B, Pfeiffer P, et al. Interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein as prognostic biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(46):75013–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong VK, Malik HZ, Hamady ZZ, Al-Mukhtar A, Gomez D, Prasad KR, et al. C-reactive protein as a predictor of prognosis following curative resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(2):222–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitsunaga S, Ikeda M, Shimizu S, Ohno I, Takahashi H, Okuyama H, et al. C-reactive protein level is an indicator of the aggressiveness of advanced pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2016;45(1):110–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pine JK, Fusai KG, Young R, Sharma D, Davidson BR, Menon KV, et al. Serum C-reactive protein concentration and the prognosis of ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(6):605–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiang JM, Chang CJ, Jiang SF, Yeh CY, You JF, Hsieh PS, et al. Pre-operative serum albumin level substantially predicts post-operative morbidity and mortality among patients with colorectal cancer who undergo elective colectomy. Eur J Cancer Care. 2017. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/ecc.12403Epub 2015 Nov 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nazha B, Moussaly E, Zaarour M, Weerasinghe C, Azab B. Hypoalbuminemia in colorectal cancer prognosis: nutritional marker or inflammatory surrogate? World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;7(12):370–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Abe T, Nakata K, Kibe S, Mori Y, Miyasaka Y, Ohuchida K, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative nutritional and immunological factors in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(13):3996–4003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fu YJ, Li KZ, Bai JH, Liang ZQ. C-reactive protein/albumin ratio is a prognostic indicator in Asians with pancreatic cancers: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019 November 01;98(48):e18219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zang Y, Fan Y, Gao Z. Pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio for predicting overall survival in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99(23):e20595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Strijker M, Chen JW, Mungroop TH, Jamieson NB, van Eijck CH, Steyerberg EW, et al. Systematic review of clinical prediction models for survival after surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2019;106(4):342–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Proctor MJ, Morrison DS, Talwar D, Balmer SM, O’Reilly DS, Foulis AK, et al. An inflammation-based prognostic score (mGPS) predicts cancer survival independent of tumour site: a Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(4):726–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. La Torre M, Nigri G, Cavallini M, Mercantini P, Ziparo V, Ramacciato G. The glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(9):2917–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jamieson NB, Denley SM, Logue J, MacKenzie DJ, Foulis AK, Dickson EJ, et al. A prospective comparison of the prognostic value of tumor- and patient-related factors in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(8):2318–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Numata K, Morinaga S, Katayama Y, Sawazaki S, Numata M, Godai T, et al. Combining the Glasgow Prognostic Score and Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level Improves the Ability to Predict Early Recurrence in Resected Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Gemcitabine. Anticancer Res. 2016;36(5):2467–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumari N, Dwarakanath BS, Das A, Bhatt AN. Role of interleukin-6 in cancer progression and therapeutic resistance. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(9):11553–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McMillan DC, Watson WS, O’Gorman P, Preston T, Scott HR, McArdle CS. Albumin concentrations are primarily determined by the body cell mass and the systemic inflammatory response in cancer patients with weight loss. Nutr Cancer. 2001;39(2):210–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barber MD, Ross JA, Fearon KC. Changes in nutritional, functional, and inflammatory markers in advanced pancreatic cancer. Nutr Cancer. 1999;35(2):106–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fleck A, Raines G, Hawker F, Trotter J, Wallace PI, Ledingham IM, et al. Increased vascular permeability: a major cause of hypoalbuminaemia in disease and injury. Lancet. 1985;1(8432):781–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fanali G, di Masi A, Trezza V, Marino M, Fasano M, Ascenzi P. Human serum albumin: from bench to bedside. Mol Aspects Med. 2012;33(3):209–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wahi MM, Shah N, Schrock CE, Rosemurgy AS, Goldin SB. Reproductive factors and risk of pancreatic cancer in women: a review of the literature. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19(2):103–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. (29) van der Geest, L G, Besselink MG, van Gestel YR, Busch OR, de Hingh IH, de Jong KP, et al. Pancreatic cancer surgery in elderly patients: Balancing between short-term harm and long-term benefit. A population-based study in the Netherlands. Acta Oncol 2016;55(3):278-285.

  30. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol. 2019;10(1):10–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. van Erning FN, Mackay TM, van der Geest LGM, Groot Koerkamp B, van Laarhoven HWM, Bonsing BA, et al. Association of the location of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (head, body, tail) with tumor stage, treatment, and survival: a population-based analysis. Acta Oncol. 2018;57(12):1655–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sheng W, Dong M, Wang G, Shi X, Gao W, Wang K, et al. The diversity between curatively resected pancreatic head and body-tail cancers based on the 8th edition of AJCC staging system: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Cancer 2019 October 22;19(1):981-z.

  34. Kunk PR, Bauer TW, Slingluff CL, Rahma OE. From bench to bedside a comprehensive review of pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 2016 March 15;4:14-z. eCollection 2016.

  35. Wang Y, Xiao X, Wang T, Li L, Zhu Y, Xu H, et al. A survival model in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Cancer. 2018;9(7):1301–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. La Torre M, Nigri G, Lo Conte A, Mazzuca F, Tierno SM, Salaj A, et al. Is a preoperative assessment of the early recurrence of pancreatic cancer possible after complete surgical resection? Gut Liver. 2014;8(1):102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaissis G, Ziegelmayer S, Lohofer F, Algul H, Eiber M, Weichert W, et al. A machine learning model for the prediction of survival and tumor subtype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur Radiol Exp. 2019;3(1):41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Eilaghi A, Baig S, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Karanicolas P, Gallinger S, et al. CT texture features are associated with overall survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma–a quantitative analysis. BMC Med Imaging. 2017;17(1):38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

University Medical Center Groningen. No additional grants or funding.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Laura van Wijk and Guus W. de Klein Shared first authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands

    Laura van Wijk, Matthijs A. Kanters & Joost M. Klaase

  2. Department of Surgery, Isala, PO Box 10400, Dokter van Heesweg 2, Zwolle, 8000 GK, The Netherlands

    Guus W. de Klein & Gijs A. Patijn

Authors
  1. Laura van Wijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guus W. de Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthijs A. Kanters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gijs A. Patijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joost M. Klaase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: LW, GAP, and JMK. Administrative support: not applicable. Provision of study materials or patients: GAP and JMK. Collection and assembly of data: LVW, GWK, and MAK. Data analysis and interpretation: all authors. Manuscript writing: all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joost M. Klaase.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University Medical Centre Groningen and Isala Zwolle (research registration number: 201900699). Informed consent was exempted due to the policy or the law of the government or the type of the research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Wijk, L., de Klein, G.W., Kanters, M.A. et al. The ultimate preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio is a prognostic factor for survival after pancreatic cancer resection. Eur J Med Res 25, 46 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40001-020-00444-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40001-020-00444-z

Keywords

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us