Skip to main content

Table 4 Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for hypothyroidism according to the dietary pattern scores a

From: Cardiometabolic-related dietary patterns and thyroid function: a population-based cross-sectional study

 

Tertile 1

Tertile 2

Tertile 3

p-trend

Per SD

p value

Clinical hypothyroidism

 Native-based exploratory pattern

  No. of participants

1041

1041

1042

 

3124

 

  No. of cases

38

39

56

 

133

 

  Unadjusted

1.00

1.03 (0.65, 1.62)

1.50 (0.98, 2.28)

0.056

1.14 (0.95, 1.36)

0.154

  Model 1

1.00

1.03 (0.65, 1.63)

1.55 (1.01, 2.37)

0.042

1.14 (0.96, 1.36)

0.142

  Model 2

1.00

1.02 (0.62, 1.67)

1.65 (1.04, 2.62)

0.033

1.16 (0.95, 1.40)

0.141

 EPIC-based exploratory pattern

 

  No. of participants

1041

1041

1042

 

3124

 

  No. of cases

43

42

46

 

133

 

  Unadjusted

1.00

1.02 (0.67, 1.57)

1.07 (0.70, 1.64)

0.749

1.08 (0.91, 1.29)

0.383

  Model 1

1.00

1.01 (0.65, 1.56)

1.08 (0.70, 1.66)

0.733

1.09 (0.91, 1.30)

0.365

  Model 2

1.00

1.06 (0.66, 1.69)

1.23 (0.77, 1.69)

0.386

1.13 (0.93, 1.37)

0.212

 FOS-based confirmatory pattern

  No. of participants

1042

1041

1041

 

3124

 

  No. of cases

50

40

43

 

133

 

  Unadjusted

1.00

0.79 (0.52, 1.21)

0.86 (0.56, 1.30)

0.435

0.90 (0.75, 1.06)

0.180

  Model 1

1.00

0.78 (0.51, 1.19)

0.84 (0.55, 1.27)

0.378

0.90 (0.74, 1.06)

0.179

  Model 2

1.00

0.88 (0.55, 1.40)

0.81 (0.51, 1.27)

0.354

0.88 (0.74, 1.07)

0.144

Subclinical hypothyroidism

 Native-based exploratory pattern

  No. of participants

1111

1111

1110

 

3332

 

  No. of cases

89

129

123

 

341

 

  Unadjusted

1.00

1.51 (1.14, 2.00)

1.43 (1.08, 1.91)

0.015

1.11 (0.99, 1.25)

0.066

  Model 1

1.00

1.47 (1.11, 1.97)

1.47 (1.10, 1.96)

0.010

1.12 (1.00, 1.26)

0.061

 Model 2

1.00

1.49 (1.11, 1.98)

1.54 (1.41, 2.09)

0.005

1.14 (1.01, 1.28)

0.041

 EPIC-based exploratory pattern

  No. of participants

1110

1111

1111

 

3332

 

  No. of cases

96

119

126

 

341

 

  Unadjusted

1.00

1.27 (0.96, 1.68)

1.35 (1.02, 1.79)

0.036

1.13 (1.01, 1.26)

0.041

  Model 1

1.00

1.23 (0.93, 1.64)

1.34 (1.01, 1.78)

0.043

1.13 (1.01, 1.27)

0.037

  Model 2

1.00

1.27 (0.94, 1.71)

1.44 (1.07 1.94)

0.015

1.16 (1.03, 1.31)

0.017

 FOS-based confirmatory pattern

  No. of participants

1111

1111

1110

 

3332

 

  No. of cases

116

115

110

 

341

 

  Unadjusted

1.00

0.98 (0.75, 1.29)

0.94 (0.71, 1.23)

0.643

0.99 (0.89, 1.11)

0.871

  Model 1

1.00

0.94 (0.71, 1.24)

0.92 (0.70, 1.22)

0.568

0.99 (0.88, 1.11)

0.858

  Model 2

1.00

0.96 (0.72, 1.28)

0.92 (0.70, 1.24)

0.592

1.00 (0.88, 1.12)

0.936

  1. Model 1: Adjusted for age (continuous), and sex
  2. Model 2: Adjusted for age (continuous), sex, smoking (never, current, former), education (< 6, 6–12, ≥ 12 years), having a full-time job (yes, no), and TPOAb positivity (yes, no)
  3. aExploratory patterns were derived using the reduced rank regression