Skip to main content

Table 2 This table shows additional outcomes for some studies

From: The efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author and year

Significant adverse events

Severe illness symptoms

Mild illness symptoms

Sustained recovery

Patients entered ICU

Oxygen requirements

1. Benotmane et al. 2022 [38]

    

Only 3 of 416 patients had entered ICU

 

2. Kaminski et al. 2022 [45]

–

Within (333), (2) COVID-19-related hospitalization in the intensive care unit

  

Only 2 of 333 patients had entered the ICU in the intervention group; in the control group, six from 7 had entered the ICU

 

3. Nguyen et al. 2022 [27]

 

–

–

  

6 of 49 patients needed oxygen

4. Lafont et al. 2022 (for prophylaxis) [28]

 

–

  

1 of 15 had entered the intervention group, but two of 10 in the control group

2 of 15 patients needed oxygen in the intervention group. However, in the control group, three out of 10 needed oxygen

5. Lafont et al. 2022 (for treatment) [28]

Not reported

Within a total of l 42, (5) reported oxygen requirements, (12) hospitalization, (2) intensive care

Within a total of l 42, (2) reported asymptomatic, (26) fever, (28) cough, (15) dyspnea,

 

2 of 13 had entered the ICU in the intervention group, but two of 10 in the control group

2 of 13 patients needed oxygen in the intervention group, but in the control group, there were three from 10

6. Ordaya et al., 2022 [30]

Only two individuals had severe respiratory symptoms, while other patients showed mild respiratory symptoms with no mortality

Within eight patients: (2) showed bacterial complications, and (1) needed oxygen therapy

Ranging from asymptomatic to cough, dyspnea,

  

Only one patient out of 8 needed oxygen

7. Levin et al., 2022 (PROVENT) [11]

Total 3461 include (64) sever, (50) serious, and (93) particular interest adverse events, including (82) Injection-site reactions

–

    

9. Thomas L et al.,2022 [38]

ACTIV-3-(TICO) [37]

–

  

Of 710 patients, 17 sustained recovery in the intervention group, but 595 from 707 sustained recovery in the control

  

10. Karaba et al. 2022 [46]

Through 7 days of any T+C injection, no subjects stated any adverse cardiac events, hypersensitivity reactions, or acute organ rejection (reactions that were reported were mild to moderate)

     

11. Jondreville et al. 2022 [41]

Only one patient of, 161 had significant adverse events

     

12. Calabrese et al. 2022 [37]

Only one of 412 patients had significant adverse events

 

11 of 412 patients had mild symptoms

   

13. Goulenok et al. 2022 [49]

 

None from 10 patients had a severe illness in the intervention group, but in the control group, four of 7 patients had severe illness symptoms

    

14. Bertrand et al. 2022 [44]

 

Only 2 of 412 patients had severe illness symptoms in the intervention group. However, in the control group, 6 160 had severe illness symptoms

  

In the intervention group, 2 of 412 entered the ICU, but in the control group, entered the ICU

Â